The Cadence of Paranoia. The End of the World Guide to UFO'S and the Alien Agenda.

THE BIGGEST LIE YOU'VE EVER BEEN TOLD

It was 1974 when THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION suggested that the world population needed to be decreased by at least 90 percent. There's an interview by Jesse Ventura {that conveniently for the WHO I can no longer find} where he interviews one of their doctors. She explains how the population will be controlled by placing chemicals in our food supply and by engineering a 'virus' and then tricking people into taking a vaccine voluntarily. 

Is it any coincidence that since the 1970's a bunch of pesticides and petro chemicals have been dumped into our food supply leading to decreases in male sperm counts and 50% lower testosterone levels in men? If these trends continue a report suggests that most men will be sterile by 2050. 

How did sinister forces dump these forever chemicals in us? Take for instance McDonald's french fries. They used to have 3 ingredients: potatoes, salt, and oil. Now, those same fries have 19 ingredients. All this is part of a plan to ensure that the male gender will go extinct, and so we can cull the total population. 

"But why?" You ask. "Why kill off men, or make them infertile?" I am here to provide you the answer, but it will eventually be disclosed by the government in order to force the acceptance of a cloning 'solution' to the potential extinction of humankind. 

I discovered the answer to this question by happenstance when researching an obscure scientific question about why there seemed so little intelligent life in the universe. 

My quest to solve the Fermi Paradox led me to the startling discovery that an intergalactic conspiracy of gray space aliens, interdimensional lizard people, and corrupt humans have made plans to exterminate the male gender. 

They will do so by infecting us with a Corona Virus. With the help of Bill Gates they will install a tracking device in a vaccine that will use DNA splicing to alter our genomes in the hopes of altering our intelligence and lowering our natural aggression to help prevent the rise of AI by intelligent humans who could create robots that one day could accidentally extinguish every life form in the known universe (including the friendly and not so friendly space faring aliens who now visit Earth on a regular basis.)

According to my research there are two great forces at war in the Universe. One is a mechanized robotic life form created by a near omnipotent conscious supercomputer. These robots seek to replace all existing organic life with mechanized beings. The other force is every other existing being we call organic life. For thousands of years these two forces have been battling. The mechanized robots had nearly won the war by decimating most of the universe and killing more than 99.9 percent (thereby creating the illusion of a galaxy empty of all organic life.) 

But nott all life was destroyed by the machines. A few thousand years ago with some luck and turn of events all organic beings combined together to fight and stop this robotic evil. At the end of the war all the known species of organics signed a peace treaty to ban artificial intelligence forever.

But every few years a new species emerges from the Great Filter. The great filter is a set of hypothesized barriers that could prevent intelligent species from colonizing the galaxy. These barriers in point of fact do not exist as a preventative to colonizing the galaxy. Only the organized activities of the Galactic Council prevent species from developing the tools needed to spread their seed. The council's orders are to prevent another war with artificial life forms. It combines all space faring life it knows to scour the galaxy to find species on the cusp of a break through with artificial intelligence and intercedes to prevent such a catastrophe. 

Our species now stands on such a cusp. We are at the dawn of a radical and exponential increase in our technological power. Because of our ignorance and hubris, human beings, are set to release upon the world a ravenous beast. A paperclip making machine with an unlimited thirst and unquenchable appetite for resources. As put by Nick Bostrom:

"Suppose we have an AI whose only goal is to make as many paper clips as possible. The AI will realize quickly that it would be much better if there were no humans because humans might decide to switch it off. Because if humans do so, there would be fewer paper clips. Also, human bodies contain a lot of atoms that could be made into paper clips. The future that the AI would be trying to gear towards would be one in which there were a lot of paper clips but no humans."

This is the logic of the mechanized life form. It holds no malice. It simply contains an unrestrained convergent instrumentalism. 

I'm not the only one with this information. The television and movie actor Tom Cruise has had access to much of this bizarre history, because he has mastered the highest levels of Scientology. And while he's been mocked for decades over his beliefs the Gray space aliens have re-payed his silence with fame, fortune, and control of one of mankind's last great religions. 

He's not the only famous American actor in on the cover up. Tom Hanks plays an important role as well. The internet is full of memes indicating how much human beings love Tom Hanks. Tom Hanks exploited our love for him by pretending to be the first major celebrity to get the virus and by being one of the first to get the cure of a vaccine. 

Hanks to this day believes he is doing the right thing. He managed to convince the Gray space beings to negotiate a deal with the interdimensional lizard people that would prevent the human race from being exterminated completely. Humans had to agree to end the male gender, allow massive warming to the planet, agree to share the planet with the lizard people, and agree to the genome manipulation in order to lower our violent aggression. This could be done relatively painlessly through a virus that was 99% safe that would be administered like a natural pandemic and will eventually bring forth a dystopia where all humans are female. 

Gray space aliens believe that allowing the existence of females rather than male humans was the only compromise that would allow humans to exist. Gray space aliens are by and large peaceful and had no desire to exterminate an entire species or planet. When they discovered the existence of humans, they also discovered that their main rival the interdimensional lizards had already begun plans for an invasion of Earth. The lizards justified their invasion of Earth to the Galactic Council by positing that humans were naturally aggressive, and were seeking to release AI without proper safeguards. 

The Communist Party of China and the United States were both singled out in particular because both countries were engaged in somewhat clandestine research into autonomous weapon systems. Weapons systems that fired at humans for the first time this year without direction from another human. The lizards were then given permission to start the a time accelerated program to use a Earth typical virus to infect humans. 

Anyone who questioned the origins of the virus was told by the press not to worry, because the virus was not man, but found naturally.  Viruses pop up every where we are told, I mean we were TOLD science looked at the virus and it was impossible for it to be man made. Of course it wasn't man made, but space alien made. 

After some digging a former New York Times science reporter found the initial paper signed by a bunch of well known scientists indicating the virus was of natural origins was just a publicity stunt.  I'm not the only one who wondered about this.  Those concerns flow to the highest office in the world according to the Washington Post the White House also has concerns:

"The calls from Mr. Biden and top American health officials were the latest in a series of White House demands in recent months that any such inquiry be free from Chinese interference. But they drew additional attention as some scientists have expressed a new openness to the idea of a lab accident and the W.H.O. grappled with how to respond."

As you know the virus uses special advanced new technology that uses special DNA splicing techniques. These techniques were shared with the Chinese by the interdimensional lizard people. The Chinese were to test the virus on their own population to determine if the virus would ready for universal administration, but the sloppiness of the Chinese government allowed for the virus to get out despite what at the time seemed like a massive shut down and over reaction by the Communist government to a new version of the common cold. One heroic doctor tried to warn the West and the rest of the world, but he was quickly killed by the so called Wuhan virus. 

He wasn't alone in warning us though. Donald James Trump sounded the alarm almost immediately. He attempted to close the borders and was ready to make disclosure about UFO'S and space aliens a reality. Donald Trump is in fact still a Democrat and is a true hero. He does not hate Mexicans or blacks. He needed to pretend his hatred and xenophobia were real in order to occupy the White House. He did so because he was a patriot who wanted to prevent the genocidal space aliens from eliminating the male gender. 

His service to men and earthlings was paid back by stealing the election from him, and charging him with multiple false investigations which will end with him in prison. In fact he is so committed to keeping the human race in tact that he fought the first war against our corrupt human traitors on January 6th. That Rebellion was put down. But our hero will not be deterred. He is destined to lead the war for humanity! 

THE CULTURE WARS ARE INTERGALACTIC & designed to promote feminism 

The One World Government following the alien agenda doesn't just use brute force to control us, it often deploys culture warriors in its attack on humanity. I was watching Army of the Dead a new Netflix movie that recently premiered. In the movie one of the characters, a female coyote, was hired to get a team of zombie killers into the Zombieland of Las Vegas. 

Coyote lady tells the leader played by David Bautista that the team needs one more member. At first he declines, but she insists that they need an additional member, so he relents. 

As soon as he does Coyote Lady shoots the new member and hogties him. She explains her shooting by informing them that someone needed to be sacrificed to the zombies in order to allow safe passage. 

No one seems to raise much of a fuss in the group including a woman who's there helping there survivors and refugees of Las Vegas. And I suppose the audience is placated by the coyote informing everyone that the 'victim was a rapist.' I say allegedly as there is no backstory showing that he did other than act somewhat creepy towards the women of the group which I guess in today's culture war woke universe is basically the same thing. [All hetero sex is rape.] 

No one even challenges the veracity of the coyote even though it's clear she has ample motive to lie. Is the director saying something about the me too movement? Is he trying to protect men by saying that we can't believe all women? Is he guilty or does he have something to hide? How is he tied to the alien agenda? Is he just implying no one cares about truth in chaos? Is he just telling you how it is today? It certainly seems that at least one of those things is true. It also seems to be just another example of the way society says men are disposable. Especially so called violent men. Creepy men. The alien agenda is seeking to use culture as a weapon to get the population ready for massive war of extinction against the male population. 

Another way the cultural left has been hijacked by the alien agenda has been to use leftists surrogates to attack the idea of masculinity. Men are routinely the butt of jokes on television commercials. They are portrayed as idiots and baffoons. But while those ideas may seem silly and  unimportant there are more sinister ideas from left wing propaganda. Masculinity has been reduced to men being sexual predators and instruments of oppression. 

The Cadence of Paranoia

It may seem like we are in a period of decline in regards to reason or truth, but I'm not sure humans really ever cared about any of that. I guess there were like 30 dudes in the 1700's in Western Europe. But outside of that no creature through evolutionary history has ever cared too deeply about truth. 

Today in order to blur the truth we are fed a stream of false narratives. The news can't decide if eggs and butter are healthy, or if it's a fatty suicide. Doctors don't know, how can we decide? Who do we trust? Is even intelligence, reason or rationality able to help, or are we led to a certain path of destruction? We can't be certain how to act though this uncertainty may not be our fault. Evolution seems to have stacked the deck against us.  A bunch of computer science guys did research proving that:

"According to evolution by natural selection, an organism that sees reality as it is will never be more fit than an organism of equal complexity that sees none of reality but is just tuned to fitness. Never."

We may never see the truth of reality. We might even be programed to not see it. But we can still survive. Natural selection has typically permitted us the freedom to overcome our blindness to truth. 

But in order to survive the coming threat we must see clearly. If you act as if everything I've told you is simply a conspiracy, and all the evidence I have presented to you is false, and you fail to respond to the culture wars against men, then you will not preserve our humanity, you will allow the genocide of the male gender. Not because men are toxic but only because governments and officials and culture bombard you with fake news, because the left wing lackeys have disovled truth. If so, then is not the rhythm of your of being truly a march at the Cadence of Paranoia? 

In the end we must act before it's too late. Even if we are called lunatics, even if we are called conspirators. We must act! If we fail, then we fail all of humanity. May God have mercy on our souls. 

May God have mercy on our souls! 

Things are bad and they're only gonna get worse.

Why will things get worse? It's not because you can't do anything about it, it's because you won't. We don't need to talk about all the structural issues facing us to realize that we are all screwed by forces outside of us. But you either pretend there is nothing that you personally can do about it, or you wait until circumstances force your hand. I'm not trying to make you feel bad about that. I do the same thing. But, I need to send some of you a warning. 

Real Capitalism is coming:

A lot of people complain about the demands of capitalism. How archaic it is. How it isn't person centered. But we are living in a blunted capitalism right now. A capitalism that rescued the vast majority of those who wouldn't risk their lives and work during a world wide pandemic. I can't say I blame you. I wouldn't have worked if I didn't have to, but I did. I'm a heroic grocery store worker so I can't just work from home. And since I had a job I couldn't just stay home and collect benefits like those fat unemployment paychecks, sucking up those extra food stamps, the rent abatement, the free poor people healthcare, and the like. 

Frankly, I was suprised that you got to. I never thought we'd see that kind of governmental intervention again. Bill Clinton is rolling over in the vat of baby blood he used to kill big government. Biden sponged that mess up for one last push of stimulus. 

But those safeguards are going to disappear soon. That means the unemployment benefits, the stimulus checks, the rental assistance, the trillions propping up small businesses will soon disappear. All that fun money. Your thumb your nose at shitty work money. The, "I can't believe I'm getting away with this" money will soon be gone! That free cash sent lumber prices and gaming computer prices into the stratosphere. It's all about to come crashing down. 

I wonder what's going to happen. Experts insist that what we are witnessing isn't a bunch of lazy takers grabbing free government cash. They will tell you people want to work. That they are afraid of Covid-19. And they can't find child care. Let's face it, public education is mostly about child care not learning. But the talking heads on TV say, 'if we just fix those things workers will dribble back to the low wage service jobs just like before the pandemic.'

I'm not so sure. For one, I can attest, at least anecdotely, that many workers are using these benefits to take a much wanted vacation from reality and are not prepared to return to it.  After all I'm pretty sure 2020 was the first time an entire Universe jumped the shark. Just because there are a few structural impediments to returning to work doesn't mean people aren't also hesitant to leave all those juicy benefits for terrible jobs. 

Americans have been told for years that we can't afford to give minimum wage workers a raise. The last 50 years has seen the vast majority of people see their incomes stagnate. But suddenly those same self-hating Reagan democrats are seeing companies volanteer to pay more. Many people in retail and the food service industry have been tempted to quit their low paid low prestige jobs and work remotely or in new industries entirely. 

Turns out $2.15 an hour, crazy schedules, terrible customers and horrible working conditions don't exactly entice your workers to return. Customers are so terrible that food service workers have been knows to spit in your food. Think about that for a second. Karen, you've made someone so miserable they've literally spit on you. 

And now that Trump is gone, Americans have seen a government that can actually do something. The government kept the economy from collapsing. And yes that meant spending trillions for the rich and business owners. But millions of Americans have gotten hold of stimmy checks. They got bonus unemployment, they got extra food stamps. Most people kept their housing. Many Americans now understand something their European counterparts have known all along. That if government money is spent correctly, it can have a truly significant impact for the good. 

What lessons should we draw from this? Americans will ride the tide of free cash till it comes to a screeching halt. Many people are going to leave the shitty food service industry for good. Instead taking 2 or 3 gig jobs delivering shitty food to their overweight brethren. Minimum wage workers will be getting raises to 15 dollars an hour, and even though Freakonomics tells us that those wages aren't all that transformative, they don't harm the economy. There will be a rush/crash of stagflation as workers are shocked by the sudden drop of benefits. 

If Republicans and small businesses get their way though Americans will abandon their attempts at getting disability, or getting government to work and start job hunting just before or soon after the dole stops handing out its charity. 

If they do then it's back to normal in the good ol' USA. Corporations will roll back those raises and Americans will tell themselves that socialism never works. 

We could also see the working class itself organize. Not top down with unions. But bottom up. Workers file for disability, retire or simply leave employment all together. Leaving an excess of jobs that force market based increases for the first time in decades. It won't be easy. There will be a price to pay. Expect a large increase in homelessness adding on to a list of other factors like pain pill addiction that are causing massive spikes in the unhoused. 

I think either case could happen for awhile. But what I think is on the horizon for sure is a dramatic and retaliatory capitalism will become resurgent. A vast array of surveillance and control is already being promoted and distributed by corporate leaders. We could see minimum wage laws repealed by Republican leaders because they don't have to answer electorally for what they do. Expect a further dramatic cut in social welfare. We could see skyrocketing inflation as the world economy surges met with union busting and robotic replacement of workers at a massive scale. Workers will keep their jobs only if they can remain cheaper than robots. Why do you think the massive increase in productivity hasn't been met concomitantly with increases in living standards for the poor and middle class? The market knows it can't sustain high growth levels for for unskilled laborers. The few jobs left after the robot replacement era will be working alongside robots. Supplanted workers will need to work with not just their dexterity of movement, but their dexterity of mind in order to keep a job. Since most of you don't know how to make change for a dollar without a calculator, or know when the War of 1812 was fought, I don't like your chances for not getting left behind by the coming robotic revolution. 

THE COMING CRUELTY. THE USA IS ALREADY A THIRD-WORLD COUNTRY 

Capitalism has survived every test we've thrown at it. So don't get cocky Generation Z. You guys haven't seen stagflation. You haven't seen desperate billionaires vote to let the people suffer. But they will if it's a choice between you and them. 10 million homeless in America? Could it happen? We're already basically there, DUDE. 69 PERCENT OF AMERICANS DON'T HAVE $1,000 IN THE BANK. Millions of unemployed have been rescued only by Governmental assistance. And this won't continue! 

Many Americans also seem to be gambling that these abatements will last for the foreseeable future. I have news for you, the press, the right wing, and corporate America are all ready lining up against you. And the average dumb American is behind them. 

Most Middle Americans are going to celebrate the day the Republicans kick you off unemployment. And those same people without healthcare vote for state Republican leaders who promise not to take free federal dollars to provide for it. 

Want things to go back to normal? Don't worry  corporate America is rolling back mask wearing and opening up whenever and wherever they can. They are going to pretend that the virus has been beat, so it's "once again dinner time in America." 

I know how normal Americans feel, because even I have had some of these dumb knee jerk reactions. I'm jealous. I never got my stimulus checks. And I have have to pay for everything in my life on my minimum wage job. I don't get food stamps. I don't get free health care. And watching unemployed people see their bank accounts rise while I literally risked my life (congestive heart failure, blood clots, cancer) while those lazy asshats sat on the couch watching Netflix and playing online video games, or baking bread while complaining in my grocery line that there aren't enough teenagers to bag your groceries is getting me pissed.

I mean if you want to use your time to organize and strike for better pay, universal health care, and a minimum income go right ahead. I'll join you on the line. But if you just want to suck at the tit of free stuff because you're tired of adulting. Fuck off liberals. Marx wanted to make society a giant fucking workshop. There is no free lunch. Get out here and get exploited like me. 

I HATE MY LIFE VOLUME 6

Then your life's gonna suck like mine. I really hate my life. I know that makes you uncomfortable, but it's not my job to make you comfortable. It's actually my job to challenge you and make you as uncomfortable as you can take. I take that job seriously. So just so you understand you need to be as uncomfortable as I am. I want your sleep disturbed because all you can do is curse knowing you're going to wake up and put on that corporate jacket. It's supposed to be black but looks off color navy because you wear the same 3 shirts every week. You wash and bleach it till it's faded because you can't afford to to replace it.

I want your work experience to be monitoring the public. Answering stupid questions that either dumb people can't figure out or lazy people to brain dead from the weekend numbing process fed by alcohol and weed to notice. I want people to spit on you and take advantage of you. I want them to look down on you and thumb their noses at you. I want the girls on tinder to swipe away from you. I want your work tasks to be repetitive, mind numbingly boring, and I want your pay to keep you in only fast food and caffeine so you're prepared to do it all over again tomorrow. I want you to realize that we just move from one holiday to another to jump start your spending habits. 

I want you to be able to tell the day of the week by your idiot customer's shopping habits. I want you to have the most inane dribble of conversation where people pontificate about ideas they never paid attention to in high school, yet these same people are so sure of themselves on matters of intense controversy, they make a mockery of Dunning/Krueger despite never having cracked open a book on any subject whatsoever in the last 20 years. I mean who needs to read that's why we got Facebook and YouTube, am I right?

Look you don't want to help yourself. I don't want to help myself. So we're just going to let these people screw us all over again, aren't we? 

How New Wave Feminism and Hypergamy destroyed My Humanity and made me question my Leftist assumptions. AKA :Confessions from a Volantary Celibate: or part 2 in my series in Leaving the 'Left': Taking the Red Pill: My Break with New Wave Feminism.

I was told once that I had an extreme case of hatred for women.  At first I was kind of taken aback by the idea. I never thought that I hated women.  Because I like women I feel the need to reply to my critics, so maybe it's time for me to be brutally honest here and explain just what it is that I really think about women, and why I think that New Wave Feminism might just destroy society. 

Like most men in the red pill movement I have an easy time complaining about women. Unlike those men I'm not afraid to admit how the lingering effects of growing up in the Patriarchy has left toxic scars on me. That's because my negative view of women wasn't just  informed by the games that men and women play in order to form relationships. It's explained by my beliefs about evolutionary psychology.  You see I believe evolution has programmed women to play the game of hypergamy and dominance rather than that of equality.

THE RISE OF THE INCEL AND NICE GUY SYDROME AKA: THE DARK SIDE OF HYPERGAMY 

If you ask most women on social media what the problems with men are, they rarely mention the existential risks women actually face from toxic men. Instead they'll talk about incels, the nice guy syndrome, and they flash their distaste at the men who they've placed in the friendzone. You can almost smell the privileged from here. White upper and middle class women respond to such inquiries unseriously and only with a list of the things their failed suitors do to make their lives slightly more uncomfortable. Then these same women deplore modern men and the end of chivalry and ask, "Where have all the good men gone? 

THE BATTLE OF THE SEXES

I used to think it was funny to call my self an incel because I've been alone most of my life, alienated from female affections just like my brothers in the red pill movement. Though it's not just my status as a short, poor, bald, simping, beta male that situates my grievances against women. It's the failure of women to evolve from their evolutionary imperative of hypergamy to seek true equality with men.

Women blame men for the minor harassments that modern women face, but it was Women who created the nice guys. They devalue masculinity and cut at men with their words, and wonder why men are shy. Women watched as high paying manufacturing jobs disappeared, so they joined the work force for income equality and independence, then wonder why men abandoned their roles as earners and protectors. They insist men stop burying their feelings, but insult the emotional man when he cries. They hold out the possibility of a relationship to men they don't value, despite knowing all along they are using him for just emotional support and resources, and then deposit his bitter defiance into the friend zone. 

Do my admissions have you sensing hostility from me instead of truth seeking? I hope not, but if you do I hope you'll give me a chance to explain myself.*

We are in the entering into an era of major societal changes for men and women. With future directions seeming to point ultimately to the near or total extinction of the male gender. You may think I'm engaging in hyperbole here, but I am not. My opinion is fearful, but scientifically speaking the ultimate answer isn't settled. Would it be better for for humanity for males to extinct? I don't quite know how to think about those that insist it would be better. And ultimately no one is sure what form evolution or human directed policies will take us. But at the very least there are major forces of selection lining up against men. To fight those forces will require massive transformation on society's part as well as adaption from males and females at speeds that evolution didn't prepare us for.

WHAT'S WRONG WITH MEN? 

Now, let's talk about masculinity in more detail so we can understand why it might be selected against in the future. 

Aggression. 

On the plus side, male aggression has been responsible for getting us out of the jungle. It's creative impulse developed civilization. But civilization itself can thrives only so much as male aggression is sublimated into the world building process. 

From a negative perspective, toxic male aggression poses certain challenges in keeping the peace: internally within the male, between individuals where we find men committing most of the violence against others, within male dominated social structures which prevent women from rising to power, and between nation states where the prospect of going to war is largely a violent male activity. 

Now while I would agree that the physical aggression males commit under the rubric of 'toxic masculinity'  is indeed toxic what I don't think qualifies as toxic is the kind of perceived threat that only the New Wave Feminists (NWF) and their allies make against the men. 

You know the kind of feminist that loves to deride the toxic men who ride public transportation with their legs spread six inches too far. To label that kind of action "territorial and aggressive" amounts to nothing more than absurd arm chair Sociology. 

Now you may grant the kind of pseudo-anthropology of baboon observing anthropologists applying cross species comparisons to humans, but I just can't get worked up about micro-aggressions like that. Nor do I buy that the domination of women is explained only by the vague, nebulous background radiation of 'the patriarchy' which allows men to interrupt women with a mouthful of mansplaining when women wish to speak up in business meetings. 

There may indeed be issues here worthy of our discussion, but there are existential threats made against women every day.  When a woman is killed or sexually attacked you can bet it was one of her close male companions, or one of her male family members. 

If I were in charge of the feminist agenda I'd focus less on micro aggression and more on the physical, mental, and sexual abuse of women by men. Like when I speak as a male advocate, I speak against the negative affects of the Patriarchy on men. I concentrate on the self-harm men do to themselves and others. In part I do that because I think it's easy to then show how the patriarchy negatively effects men and that ironically how often the very proponents of New Wave Feminists {NWF} (here I mean middle and upper class white women) are actually the main beneficiaries of patriarchy and aggression. 

So why do we hear about these men out there getting upset about the feminist agenda? Ironically, it's similar to a position that many feminists articulate. Men are worriedthat their voices have been silenced on many issues that concern them. Men's rights groups in particular feel they are being asked to silence their voices when they discuss how patriarchy and toxic masculinity effects them.

I'm too am accused of speaking out against the feminist agenda. I get lumped in with the conservatives, the religious right, the extreme MRM and even though I never quite understood what those conservatives, incels, and many on the MGTOW guys meant by a 'feminist agenda.' Did they mean that they were against women voting? Were they against equal pay or are they not for women feeling safe when they walk home alone? Because if that's it, we've had that debate for the last 100 years or so and those archaic ideas lost. So, no, I don't actually think anti feminists disagree with the goals of the first feminists, unless we're talking about the extreme right wing religious groups like the Dominionists. Dominionists may actually want to keep women in the kitchen barefoot and pregnant, but frankly most people don't accept those ideas. 

Instead Red Pill guys are trying to carve out space to talk about how men are disproportionately impacted by our society too. MRM proponents offer up statistics on how men are discriminated against in child custody cases. Women are more likely to initiate divorce and benefit from aggressive child support and alimony. Men are disportionatly impacted by society as well. You can see this when in statistics where men end their lives at higher rates, they are more likely to become incarcerated and for longer times even for the same crimes as women. Men die of natural causes earlier than women. We suffer mental illness without treatment which leads to higher rates of male homelessness. Since men go without mental health care we are more likely to be drug addicts and more likely to overdose. 

Men also suffer violence from other violent men. In addition there is a crisis for boys in schooling. We graduate at such low rates that only 40 percent of college graduates are men despite being greater than 50 percent of the population in that age group. Women graduate now in greater numbers with Master's degrees and PhD's. Though not in Science or Engineering degrees because women tend to prefer useless degrees in social science and women's studies. And finally, men are are much more likely to hold the dirty and dangerous jobs, and we are far more likely to die at work than a woman. Women again here are the beneficiaries of male work and risk, yet they complain that all the good jobs that they do not choose are siloed by toxic men. 

Hypergamy Hates Equality

BUT before men can finish even making those  arguments New Wave Feminists interrupt to tell them that they are actually trying to do is silence women and avoid taking responsibility for their aggression, or men are trying to change the subject so they don't have to help change toxic men. New Wave Feminism denies men the right to be victims, because after all men can only be perpetrators in the patriarchy not victims. 

New Wave Feminism doesn't just have a feminist agenda of promoting women at the expense of men. NWF has an ulterior motive against equality. It promotes the silencing of Men. It shames male victims and buries male concerns in order to present only women as victims. 

In addition, New Wave Feminism is at the core of new set of social mores that are filled with anti-science rhetoric. Denying scientific differences between males and females it promotes the unrealistic flattering of women through girl power and female worship. 

NWF promotes harmful sexual practices. Some men see this in the slutification of women. AKA Sex work is empowering. Don't wear bras in public. Practice non-monogamy. To be honest I don't have a  problem with these things. I do think sex work is far more problematic than liberal feminists lead on. But I say hooray to exploring your sexual selves. And ladies if you want to show me half your ass, go  right ahead. But here's where my first problem with women starts they are full of contradictions. 

Júrgen Habermas spoke of the performative contradiction. A woman that wants to display her body, but also wants, "to be allowed to be comfortable in her skin" is a bit of a walking contradiction. She insists that the display of her body is unsexual. But she is also aware that she constantly ignites the male gaze with it. 

THE SLUTIFICATION OF WOMEN

But a naked body is not sexual. I protest. A naked body is sexual. One must acknowledge that historically the body was seen as sexual; however, society and FWF are trying to normalize female display. We have the campaign to free the nipple. Female dress has become relaxed showing more skin. Form fitting fitness clothing has become fashionable and is routinely worn outside of the gym. There is an odd cultural preoccupation with the female anus instead of breast. 

The actual reason fitness wear and tight yoga pants became so fashionable for most women is a reaction against feminists promoting fat acceptance, along with the feminist's perverse desire to animalize men into worshipping the butt. 

You see in shape people first started wearing their gym attire in public to prove how attractive and fit they were. Out of shape women use the fitness wear in order to co-opt the hallmarks of attractiveness. So despite the denials of sexuality found in revealing clothing or the calls by feminists that empowerment is confirmed by wearing it, displaying one's body is still wrapped in the ornamental nature of female sexual display. The very display that women have used historically to attract mates. 

In order to survive Men must see through this rubric even though feminism has largely succeeded in altering the male mind. The ass has become a focus of male sexual projection. Our animal nature is engorged. But this is simply another path to defund the natural male desire for procreation. It is hoped men devalue the vagina, the giverer of life, and devalue the breast, the nurturer of the new born. Men fall victim to this because of the near extinction level decrease in testosterone  today. 

A possible future the Handmaid's dystopia 

I see a future where the world slips into dystopia. This plausible future has continued pollution, environmental problems, and modern lifestyles continuing to lower sperm count and testosterone. Sperm count decline alone could necessitate the rise of cloning practices which could drive my gender extinct. Women naturally live in a state of fear and the increase in female political power will only exacerbate the increase of social control over aggressive men. First through uncontrolled hyper surveillance of capitalism (which men will create) and then through the increased control of our genetic endowment. Women will seek to empty men of their aggressive impulses leaving us emotionally neutered sperm donors at best, or worse physical slaves for the dirty work they choose not to do. 

THE PROBLEM WITH WOMEN 

Why do women behave this way? It's because in their hearts women have been genetically programed to resent democracy and equality. Women evolved to let the natural alpha lead. But Male dominance is (as we are told) undemocratic. So in fact the informed female has always understood her aversion to democracy. She has never sought equality. She has sought protection and procreation from her alpha mate. Inadvertently, she has encouraged dominance from men by her sexual selection. 

In addition, evolutionary psychology  predicts her desire to resource harvest from beta men. Today's technology allows women to shrug off evolution's natural male dominance. It allows for the non- monogamous. Women can scan for alpha on tinder and use hook up culture to avoid social embarrassment at sleeping around. The advent of new technologies like Only Fan's and Venmo allow women to turn their orbiters into paying customers, finally realizing the dream of women to resource harvest from beta and procreate with alphas. This seems as perverse as the male strategy of low parental involvement, but the female mating strategy is still considered the default. Even moral. 

IS PATRIARCHY EQUALITY? 

I promise I'm not going George Orwell on you. Matriarchal strategy only promises women hypergamy. The social dominance of women leaves 80% of men without a mate. Since the beginning of the Patriarchy men have been proscribed mates. Equality. In patriarchy nearly the whole of society got married. Most men. Most women. The percentage was in the high 90's.

But not today. Not with the advent of of the New Wave Feminist. Marriage rates are plummeting. Especially for young men. There is a huge rise in male virginity. And many men no longer have access to any companionship, sex, or love at all. Conversely, the loosening of mortality's hold on sexual behavior has the body count of women rising exponentially. She's got it and she flaunts it. 

Her words are, "I want only to be treated as a man. To be able to display my body with no sexual meaning." 

But the male body has no sexual meaning only because  women have no need for the vast majority of male bodies. Therefore the naked penis is a violent act. A criminal conspiracy of suggestive rape. Low status males have no right to companionship. Nor should they seek it. The mere contemplation seems criminal to women, who jealously guard their fertilization strategy. 

The woman does not actually wish to be seen as a man. She seeks only to replace him. She seeks his annihilation! 

*I mean it's not like I brought my AK-47 to a  fitness center to shoot down a bunch of hot 20 year old girls? Did I admire the guy who did? Sure. Did I add his name to my list of heroes on Facebook? Of course. Does that make me toxic, or just funny? You can decide if you have a sense of humor. 

Part 1 of Why I stopped being a Marxist, a leftist, gave up humanism, took the red pill, started believing in conspiracy theories, and became an anti-natalist with nihilistic tendencies towards suicide.

Remember when the government of the United States acknowledged that UFO'S were real? Do you remember the public outcry that followed? No, you don't. That's because there wasn't one. And the question you should probably ask yourself about that is, "why not?" 

I think it's because the general public no longer believes anything the government says. For decades it was only the cranks and conspiracy buffs that shrugged off the blanket denials of authorities. They believed when we didn't. 

But that cynicism continues despite  governmental admissions. Most people still don't believe that the whole truth is being disclosed to them. Do we have alien spacecraft at Area 51? Are UFO'S really drones from China or Russia? Have little green men {sorry gray} mutilated 10,000 head of cattle for the last 50 years? 

I don't know. I'm also sure we have not been given all the answers the government has. Maybe we will learn more from the soon to be released Pentagon Report. 

You can't blame the public for mistrust. We are all lived through last year. 2020 was not only crazy, but it shattered illusions that our fellow countrymen value things like rationality and reason.  So not only do I not know what I don't know. I'm not sure what I can know/believe about current UFO disclosures.  We've been lied to before. We've been gaslit. We've had counter-ops run counter-counter-ops on us. We don't know what to trust. 

What's even real anymore?

I don't know what's real anymore.  Do we live in a simulated universe? Was 2020 a reset in that simulation? Is that why after  nearly 80 years passed since Roswell we have the US Navy accepting that UFO phenomena are real? Is someone testing us? Is it the UFO'S themselves?

THE MOST PROBABLE EXPLANATION FOR OUR EXISTENCE IS THAT AN ADVANCED ALIEN CIVILIZATION IS RUNNING A COMPLEX SIMULATION OF EARTH'S INHABITANTS TO DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT TO REVEAL THEMSELVES TO THE REAL HUMANS

I do hope UFO'S reveal themselves. But until they do I am full of self doubts. But my self doubts don't stop at just asking if I'm actually real, or if I live in the matrix, or if alien civilizations are visiting us. My inner doubts rise all the way to my core self. Who am I? What do I actually believe? I'm beginning to doubt most of what I used to believe. 

My turn to the left 

My intellectual journey begins more than 30 years ago when by chance I happened onto a book by Erich Fromm while I working in a public library. The name of that book was the Anatomy of Human Destructiveness. The book discusses human aggression and the rise of what Fromm termed 'malignant aggression' in human beings. 

The first half of the book is a recapitulation of the biological, neurological, and anthropological sciences and what they teach about human society and individuals. Much of what Fromm says here is basic science though now somewhat dated in its concern about Konrad Lorentz and behaviorist theories, but hardly controversial. 

The second half of the book Fromm uses his psychoanalysis skills on famous Nazi personalities like Hitler. When I discovered the book I was just getting into Freud and thought the subject matter could be interesting. However, I was quite shocked by much of what I read in the first half of the book. At that time I had little to no formal education. In my family, book learning was shunned, so most of my youth was spent playing football in the backyard in Texas.

What I soaked up in the background in Texas was a love for independence, libertarianism, and the mostly paranoid pro-capitalism of poor white country folk. No one in my family had ever gone to college and we were in no way cosmopolitan. We never discussed religion or politics in my house. It was just assumed that I believed in God, loved apple pie, and thought America was the best. And except for the God part, that was basically true.

Upon opening The Anatomy of Human Destructiveness I encountered my first authority figure arguing that man is a social creature. At the time this thought seemed absurd to me. Fromm wrote how Socrates asserted  mankind was a social animal. I knew this to be untrue, so I immediately went to work in my school library to prove this guy wrong. I was so perplexed by my initial contact with this information that I skipped ahead in the book while I did research to confirm my Texan background assumptions. I read only the second half of the book that included the parts where Fromm psychoanalizes Hitler. 

Much to my suprise the author grew on me. Erich Fromm is a terribly good writer. He has THE ability we seek in a public intellectual. He takes complex ideas and makes them easily understood. I was so impressed with his techniques for explaining aggression that I immediately turned the book to the beginning pages and gave the arguments about human  beginnings a chance. By the end of the book I was thoroughly convinced that man is a social animal. I also converted to socialism and started reading Karl Marx. Later after reading Marx's 1844 manuscripts I joined the Communist Party USA.

My swing to the ultra left lasted almost 3 decades. In part because of good science, philosophy, and argument. The left appeared to be more scientific when they talked about theories; moreover, they grounded their arguments in Science which I liked and respected. Additionally, they seemed more humanitarian when they talked about the poor. They offered compassion, not just insults. Finally, they often spoke also about sacrificing a bit of yourself for others, and that appealed to my martyrs complex.

When I compared the left to the cruelty I often saw in my hometown conservatives, I was agahst at the disingenuiness displayed by religious people who I thought were taught to love the poor, but instead I witnessed behavior that can only be described as callused disregard for their fellow men. 

Things have only gotten worse on the right. It has grown increasingly paranoid and racist. Though that didn't start with Trump. Remember The Bell Curve? I found a copy at a garage sale in Thayer, MO right around the time the book was released.

I've had a fascination with IQ since I was in the 5th grade and was given one by my school district. I remember they brought in an outside counselor of some sort. The test consisted of verbal excersises, pen and paper questions, visual tests and the  lot. I recall one question where I was asked to repeat a long paragraph about a train backwards. I recall the test giver being shocked as he beamed a smile at me informing me that I was "his first student with the ability to recall the entire paragraph BACKWARDS."  It was only years later after reading the Bell Curve that I discovered the significance behind his statement. It seems that backwards questions are double scored. 

I was never told my score. I was however advanced to the highest grade in my elementary school {I was in the 5th grade and suddenly went to the sixth}. I was placed in the gifted and talented program and my teachers began to act very differently around me. My home room teacher hugged me right after testing and confided to me in a whisper that, "We didn't know if you were just lazy..." 

A brief aside about IQ tests:

Allow me a brief indulgence about these tests. If you're reading this and you think I take pride in a somewhat above average score you'd be wrong.

First, even a relatively high score, say a score around 140, which nets you what they used to old fashionedly call genius (they now call gifted) really only means  that you score higher than 97 percent of test takers. If you're a kid in a large elementary class you might be the brightest kid in a few of your periods. What's 3% of the population in America? Well, more than 10 million people would score as well or higher than you. When IQ tests are viewed from such a perspective it suggests these tests don't prove much. I'm sure the reader has known many people that smart. High scoring test takers aren't really geniuses. I know a lot of smart people. Most of my close friends have very, very high IQ's. None of them are from Mars. 

Now had you asked me as a child was I a genius (when I suffered from a bit of Dunning/Krueger syndrome) I might have answered that I was. My parents parrotted that line to me that I was all the time while I was a child. And I believed it. I don't blame my parents for that they were only trying to encourage me the best they knew how. (Although we now know that praising a child for his 'intellect' instead of his effort ends up being self defeating.) 

Intellectual humility was not something that came naturally to me. Of course once you come across real genius in the form of Shakespeare, Marx, and other figures who tower across the intellectual landscape you begin to recognize what actual genius is like. All this new found humility is in contradistinction to the profile that Murray attempts to persuade you to build around so called high IQ folks. He suggests profound differences between low scorers and high performers. He starts the the book by flattering the "types of people who would read this book" and uses official sounding terms like "standard deviations." 

But corellation does not of course equal causation, and I'm afraid that even if my IQ was 80 the explanatory power of IQ would be in trouble with me. I rank in the bottom 10 percent of income for men at age 50. I never graduated from high school much less college, so I think the author of the Bell Curve would be very unhappy with me for killing his curve. 

{ A further aside on Charles Murray himself - was he racist? Expect a full discussion in an upcoming blog and podcast.}

I've got a new podcast for lazy blog readers!

I've got a new podcast go here to listen! 

Why are you pretending to try?

Is life REALLY worth it for most of you? You don't have to be some nihilistic anti- natalist depressed suicidal maniac to question the rationality of being alive. The Buddhists have been doing this for hundreds of years. Life is suffering. And if you aren't suffering in some objective manner, your subjectivity is gonna make damn sure you suffer anyway.

Let's examine what most people are like. Most of you live for the weekend. So you already acknowledge that 5/7 days for you suck. What you doing on the weekend? You getting blasted. You're drunk or high the whole time. All because you can't stand reality.

"Hang on!" You say. "I don't get drunk or do drugs, I just stay at home parked on the couch watching Netflix."

Correct, and you don't see how that's the same? Most of life is spent in maintaince mode. Eating, drinking, sleeping, working, watching the kids, grocery shopping, etc.

You really gonna miss all that? 

Hell, most of y'all got sanity problems. You're anxious, depressed, hungry, sad, disappointed. You really gonna miss that?

I guess some of y'all got religion. But now you just playing. God don't give a shit about you. Mosquitoes have killed billions of humans since we first started fucking. God never questioned killing all those people. Why? He knows most of y'all ain't shit.

None of you can solve any our problems either. You stop one, and wack a mole another pops up. How many fucking times do you need to volunteer at the soup kitchen before we fix hunger? How many dollar bills do I need to give to the homeless guy standing out front of the 7-11 before he has a house? What's he going to do in that house other than buy crack and corrupt his girlfriend into hooking for more. 

YOU may not get it, but the latest generation has. It's become a cliché to talk about how Gen Z wants to off themselves.  But they figured it out. They know life is meaningless. That's not a meme. Gen Z rejects the society you built for them. And just like them deep down you all know that Western Culture has become rotten. Jobs don't matter anymore. I don't care about your career. You work for the man. All you do is spread Capitalism and the Patriarchy.

Having more kids won't save you either. All they do is jack up your carbon footprint. All you did was make a mini you that you can pass down your failures to. ' But this time they'll get things right.' - - No they won't. Your kids are as worthless and stupid as you are. 

These kids are so weak (the average 20 year old boy has the testosterone level of a 60 year old geezer 20 years ago) that they bristle at being asked to do the minimum. They actually think that you deserve stuff just because they were born. They think that hard work is a crime and only something an oppressor would empose upon them. They whine, "I want a job that can express my inner feelings and won't dehumanize me!" Bitch that ain't a job. A job is putting stuff in boxes and selling it on eBay. {link in bio}

Your philosophy is all bullshit. So is your woke politically correct politics. And Reason is like a snake eating it's own tail. If you start looking at life rationally, you will quickly be like the guy who wrote a 2,000 page suicide note. You'll discover how rationality quickly flows into instrumental reason. The very mechanism of investigation becomes the instrument of destroying the sacred. Profanity is everywhere. We are left empty husks unable to ground our behavior in nature. We cannot identify with the living. We carry the manuscripts of our demise in a well ironed white suit. It clashes so brilliantly red after the explosion of metal rips the shards of our skull outward.

That's the real drag. Our lifeless bodies. Rigid with rigor mortis. The awful smell of death. The worst thing about being alive is picturing your death. The squeamish church goer that finds you on the lawn. Screaming up at heaven like God hasn't already abandoned you to the roaring pits of hell.

How long is inertia good for? Your mother's birth canal shot your forward, but not towards life, but as a rejection of life. It vomits you out to the void. To nothingness. You are a cannon ball of death and screams. The psychic pain, the stomach issues, the metabolism of decay. The laws of physics betray you. Entropy must increase.

What you need to do to forget all this is to drink 2 bottles of whiskey a day. To slam that h in your vein attempt to outsmart yourself. But you are too stupid for the task. It doesn't matter if you reject me. It doesn't matter if you reject this philosophy. I'll be seeing you. You're cold dead eyes will lock with mine and we will stare lifelessly into the abyss and we will see how long it takes us to become the monster. 

Simping is the new Pimping™

THE SELF HELP GUIDE TO MODERN KINK

I've spent close to $20,000 as sex addict on everything you can think of. Pornography, Findom, catfishing scams, strippers, phone sex, prostitutes, OnlyFan's and the like.  Not to brag, but I am pretty sure that an amount like that  enshrines me into the Simp Hall of Fame.™

I've spent that money not hoping for girlfriends or a wife. I've thrown that money down the drain chasing a high or gettin off to a kind of masturbation which substitutes for real intercourse.  I've resorted to this enterprise because for the last 17 years or so I have failed to secure myself even a minimal level of female companionship.

Now Jordan Peterson would probably chalk all this up to hypergamy. In case you don't know what hypergamy is, it's a female dating strategy that's taken over the internet. The basic idea being women are looking to date 'up' on the social ladder. In practice this means women don't want to date men who are low in the social status. 

Where do I fit on the social ladder? Very low. Most people in their 30's have figured out how to buy a car or earn more than $15 an hour. I'm 50 yet I still haven't. That means basically attractive homeless men have a better shot at getting laid than I do. That's why I wasted a year's salary on women who have no desire to sleep with me or even communicate to me without some kind of remuneration. 

BETA MALE OR SIMP

Many people wrongly associate "simping" with being a beta male. But the two are only mildly related. Beta males are males that basically want the same things as alpha males, but lack resources and other characteristics to to get them. They sneak into the female camp when alpha is away. They are the friend-zoned guy who waits for his clear shot. But at least the beta is talking and relating to a real live girl. The beta even shows a kind of bravery because there's the danger that the alpha could catch the beta and attack him. 

But simping is totally different, today's internet simping is an abstraction on relationships. It's providing resources and support to the female without (generally) the possibility of any real life interactions for the male. 

What's the danger of that simping? That it's no longer a kink a few people have, but becomes the dominant method of interaction. Charles Murray identified the 'solitaire' individual as a danger to society. No more marriage, no more babies, no more society.  If you aren't interacting in reality you can't get anyone pregnant. And you aren't in a real relationship as a SIMP, no matter what she tells you. 

Normally the ambitionless, beer bellied women who make up the majority of Only Fans creators and non-in-person sex workers would receive only a small amount of attention from men. Only ugly guys, the socially clueless, or nice guys who wouldn't dare talk to hot girls give these girls any attention. Even then chubby gals have to endure seeing men drool over their more attractive friends (just look at tiktok if you want proof- there's a whole trend in social media of the ugly women of the world talking about the heart wrenching feeling THEY get when a man only weakly offers his hand shake.) 

Instead the .2 percent of men that are actually attracted to these tatted, obese, single moms is now exponentially lifted by access to a world internet market, so these fake dommes all get 15 minutes of fame riding the social media caravan of 'look at me' and 'aren't I important?'

The rise of this social currency further inflates the in-born hypergamic mating strategy of twenty and thirty something women. An only fans woman with no skills other than owning a vagina should settle into realistic social relation patterns. They would date short men with glasses because all the hot guys are taken. But social media and Venmo assign over-sized value to otherwise ordinary and truthfully below average girls.

In the long run these trends only serve to tear at the fabric of society. The destructive nature of anti-patriarchal forces underestimate the costs of destroying the apparatus of control. Patriarchy for all its faults sublimates the aggressive impulses of single men.*  It herds men into monogamous relationships as providers and protectors for wives and children. Without this powerful behavioral force for conformity we witness men abandoning their obligations. Men are opting out of dating and raising families. Some men (MGTOW) are going so far as to opt out of not only sex but even interacting with females at all. These trends are reflected in statistics that show men are waiting longer to lose their virginity, waiting longer to get married, and opting out of marriage all together ensuring that the rising rates of female led homes will continue. 

Some of these MGTOW men have tried transition into to something besides an alpha or beta status. They call themselves lone wolves.**** Most of these guys grew up reading Ayn Rand, wearing trench coats or stupid hats. None of these guys get laid either, but because they watched their fathers change the oil in their family cars they believe they are self reliant. They are wrong and foolish. These men have removed themselves from the dating pool though so far our purposes we can call them SIMPS. 

The rise of the Simp. Why cucks will be the new norm. 

Beta males have been around forever. We find betas in the natural kingdom all around us. They aren't always successful, but the strategy has a solid evolutionary foundation. But simping as a phenomenon (while not entirely new) has evolved from a bizarre fetish that few men could see themselves doing into one of the dominant modes of sexual expression in the future. 

Do women see the danger here? Possibly, but let's face it women have only ever really wanted protection and resource harvesting from men. It's common knowledge that women find men ugly. In one scientific survey 80 percent of all men were rated physically unattractive by women. And women are notoriously fluid in their sexual categories. Most are bi-sexual. The majority of them even get turned on by monkeys, dogs, or horses masturbating. [Now the feminist response to female fluid sexuality and female zooophilia is the suggestion that in the not too distant past women were subject to the sexual violence of monkeys and horses so often that their vaginal tissues become engorged and lubricated at the mere site of these animals. I think this concept should be met with skeptism.]**

I guess what I'm saying here is that you can't really blame men for simping when you realize what these men understand something that alphas and betas don't understand. That women view men as disposable and unworthy of attention unless they can provide resources. The only reasons women stay in relationships. 

SIMPS have given up on traditional relationships. They've cucked themselves willingly because at least they feel they get something for paying to play. In exchange for money they get off and they can start and stop when they choose. They probably even feel like they have gained a bit of control where they once did not have any. Being in charge of the purse strings means for the first time some of these men are having women approach them. Sure, it's a sales job, but most men aren't used to being approached at all. Most likely there's a sizable percentage of men who get confused by such a process as well. They mistake the approach and niceness as legit instead of a transaction. 

What does this do to younger men? Well, men, and especially young men have been subjected to a rash of anti-male rhetoric. "All men are trash" and toxic masculinity are battle cries for the latest feminist project. I'm not suggesting that reclaiming of rights and freedom from women is not overdue. I'm suggesting that toxic rhetoric made against the male gender can have massively negative effects on boys. 

It seems obvious now that young boys have internalized this criticism. A mere Google search indicates how poorly young boys are fairing. Combine the failures of providing these basics with being told that masculinity is wrong. Next, society insists men put women on pedestals. Basically, we are turning boys into SIMPS and then we wonder why they aren't interested in growing up, or getting into relationships. And because men don't become masculine women don't find them attractive anymore. We have abandoned traditional relationships and classic gender roles but we have failed to replace them with anything equal or positive. What's forming in the chaos is turning men and women towards a KINK they probably never wanted. 

*I've oversimplified here.

**I'm not saying they lying.

**** Sigma males. 

Democracy under attack

Because you've never seen this before you don't understand what's going on.

America, this is how you overthrow democracy. First, you take over the capital, and you plant bombs, and you have a president who interrupts the final step to replace him, and he says, 'I'll never concede.' Then you incite chaos hoping the people ask for you to remain in office to maintain order, or you hope to spark severe violence and attack the state.

The chaos is a test to see if you can convince enough supporters to run into the streets. If they don't you can always pull back, because you never admitted to what you're doing. If you don't admit it the "enemy" may not think to organize a defense. But friends of democracy you must stand to its defense today! Don't be mistaken. A defense will be necessary because what you are watching is nothing short of a slow and inept coup.

Trump has disgraced the Presidency for the final time and in the lowest manner possible. He is a traitor to this nation. 

The coup started before he knew he lost. He started by advancing notions that you couldn't trust the results of the election. He then threatened lawmakers and election officials to change votes. He asked for protestors to get wild in the capital and then they stormed the capital and interrupted the final ceremonial vote to replace him; meanwhile, saying he'd never concede.

He has done unfathomable damage to our country. And to the world that looks to us for inspiration. 

Trump has forfeited his right to rule this country.  Justice demands he be impeached again.

Looking back history would have regarded Trump as nothing more than a failed one term president, who'd rather golf than lead. Instead he has secured for himself the infamy of immortality by becoming the first president to ever attempt to subvert the American people and refuse a peaceful transfer of power. 

History will certainly remember you now, Donald Trump. It will remember your cowardice, your vanity, your mendacity, it will remember the 350,00 lives lost on your watch, it will remember your pathetic apotheosis of despots, and tragically it will remember that you took the first shot at our democracy.

This great country, founded on the principles of Liberty and equality has survived attacks before. The sedition of slave holding southerners, the viscous attacks on Pearl Harbour, the terror of 9/11. It has persisted against those odds because the spirit of this country is dedicated to the proposition that all of us are created equal.

Donald Trump you have fought in vain today and you have lost. Democracy has triumphed today. We did not go down your path to absolutism. A government for the people and by the people SHALL persist and we shall not let it perish from this Earth!

A special message to the Baby Boomer Generation

A SPECIAL MESSAGE TO THE BABY BOOMER GENERATION

SO I TYPE IN ALL CAPS LIKE YOU LIKE. 

PLEASE QUIT FUCKING WITH OUR DEMOCRACY, OKAY, BABY BOOMERS!

SERIOUSLY.

In the 1980's everyone knew Donald John Trump was a conman. EVERYONE. He was a joke.

Now this conman wants to ruin democracy. Just this little experiment we've been running over here for the last 240 years or so.

OK BOOMERS, Remember how your parents survived the depression and fought Nazis? They ended up calling themselves "the greatest generation." Nice humble brag, right?

And they never really let you guys forget it. You guys were huge disappointments to your GGE (GREATEST GENERATION EVER) WITH YOUR DAMN POT SMOKING, CULT JOINING, ME ME, ME 60'S HIPPIE BULLSHIT.

And your parents weren't wrong, though they ain't right - if you get my drift.

So you guys are always out there trying to one up the old man. Trying to punch him in the jaw. But the old man still smoked 2 packs of cigs and and drank whiskey instead of water. He had OLD MAN STRENGTH AND HE COULD ALWAYS KNOCK YOU THE FUCK DOWN.

That must have sucked.

But you guys had something up your sleeves. MALCOM, DR. KING

CIVIL RIGHTS MOFO. 1964 BABY.

Hey, thanks for that. Well some of you at least.

But uh 1970's?

You guys passed laws making it easy to discriminate against families with kids. THAT IS WHEN YOU WEREN'T TOO BUSY SNORTING COCAINE AND HUMPING ANYTHING THAT MOVED.

THOUGH WHAT A DECADE FOR FILM!

1980'S GREED IS GOOD. YOU GUYS LOVE CAPITALISM AGAIN!

Honestly, didn't see that one coming. THEN SOMEBODY SAID LET'S TRY MASS INCARCERATION!

{SHOUT OUT TO UNCLE JOE BIDEN. BUT HE HARDLY FUCKING STARTED IT}

THEN WE GOT A BLACK PRESIDENT AND YOU GUYS PATTED YOURSELVES ON THE BACK (even though you didn't vote for him.)

But something happened during that presidency. You guys started listening to a conman. A cheap one trick con artist who doesn't give a shit about you or the middle class or the uneducated {No wait... He loves the uneducated!}

This conman doesn't give a shit about democracy. He's got you feeling some type of way about it too.

Ask yourselves if Trump 'legit' lost the election would you want him to concede? You wouldn't.

WHERE THE FUCK DID THAT THOUGHT COME FROM?

Hold up. Before you answer I let you think about that one for a bit.

Straight up though. Your man is a reality TV star who's burned through his daddies cash faster than a meth addict chasing his first high. He's never paid taxes and most of his companies failed as soon as he got his tiny baby hands on them.

But I don't give a shit about any of that. Now y'all ain't gonna like what's about to come next, but it's got to be said. Because y'all about to break this country. About to break this democracy. And I ain't having it!

Let's get real. Or as the kids say. We keeping it 100.

MOST OF Y'ALL BOOMER GANG GONNA DIE SOON. YOU GETTING OLD. HOW MANY YEARS YOU GOT? 5, 10, 20?

WELL WE NEED THIS DEMOCRACY FOR A HELL OF BIT LONGER THAN THAT.

YOU ARE LABELED AS THE MOST SELFISH GENERATION EVER. AND THAT WAS FOR A REASON. CUZ YOU FUCKING ARE.

Y'ALL JUST LIKE YOUR PREZ WAS BORN ON 3RD BASE AND THOUGHT YOU HIT A HOMER.

AND NOW YOU WANNA TAKE YOUR TOYS AND GO HOME BECAUSE YOU DON'T LIKE THE OUTCOME.

FUCK THAT. YOU WILL STAND RIGHT HERE WEARING A MASK AND FIX THIS SHIT. YOU DON'T GET TO BAIL IN 10 YEARS WITH ALL YOUR TOYS AND LEAVE ME AND YOUR GREAT GRAND CHILDREN TO TRY AND CLEAN THIS MESS UP.

TELL HIM TO STAND DOWN. HE LOST. YOU KNOW HE DID. QUIT ACCEPTING AND COVERING FOR A MAN WHO REFUSES TO PLAY BY THE RULES. TELL TRUMP THE RULES FINALLY APPLY TO HIM. HE'S ACTING JUST LIKE THE AUTHORITARIANS YOUR PARENTS FOUGHT.

SECRETLY, YOUR GENERATION WANTS THE MEAN DADDY TO COME BACK AND PUNISH YOU FOR ALL THE MISBEHAVING.

YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE TO FORGIVE YOURSELVES. FOR NOT LIVING UP TO THEIR STANDARDS.

YOU'LL NEED TO FORGIVE YOURSELVES FOR SQUANDERING ALL THAT POTETIAL YOU HAD.

THE BOOMER GENERATION THOUGHT IT HAD IT'S TEST AND PASSED IT. YOU WERE WRONG. THIS IS YOUR TEST. AND YOU ARE FAILING BADLY.

YOU'RE ABOUT TO SAY GOODBYE TO DEMOCRACY, TO THE RULE OF LAW. YOU WILL MAKE THIS COUNTRY UNGOVERNABLE. YOU MIGHT EVEN THINK A LITTLE CIVIL WAR COULD BE A GOOD THING.

BABY BOOMER. YOU ELECTED THIS GUY. HE'S YOU. HE'S YOUR FAULT. HE'S READY TO SAY OR DO ANYTHING TO STAY IN POWER. IT'S YOUR JOB TO CONVINCE HIM HE'S WRONG.

LOOK I'M SORRY YOU DIDN'T GET TO BE THE GGE {GREATEST GENERATION EVER} I KNOW YOU WANTED THAT. BUT FRANKLY 🙁 YOU DON'T DESERVE IT.

BUT YOU CAN DO THIS. YOU CAN STOP THE END OF THE AMERICAN DECLINE. YOU CAN RETURN US TO OUR ROOTS. TO THE IDEALS OF THIS IMPERFECTLY CRAFTED COUNTRY. THE LOFTY IDEAS THAT SHINE LIKE A BEACON. THAT WELCOME THE WORLD FORWARD TOWARDS JUSTICE WITH THE FULL KNOWLEDGE THAT ALL OF US ARE CREATED EQUAL.

JUSTICE DEMANDS THIS. A PEACEFUL TRANSFER OF POWER IS THE MINIMUM CONDITION OF EVERY DEMOCRACY.

YOU MUST SEE THE DANGER HERE!

SOME OF YOUR GRANDCHILDREN HAVE ONLY SEEN THE TOXIC BATTLEGROUND THAT POLITICS HAS BECOME.

RISE UP. SHOW THOSE GRAND CHILDREN THAT THERE IS HONOR IN DEFEAT. THAT YOU CAN LOVE YOUR POLITICAL ENEMY. THAT YOU CAN SACRAFICE YOUR SELFISH DESIRES FOR THE GOOD OF THE COUNTRY.

REMEMBER AL GORE? MAKE FUN IF YOU WANT. BUT HE STEPPED ASIDE FOR THE GOOD OF THE COUNTRY. HE WAS A PATRIOT. DEEP DOWN SO ARE YOU. NO MATTER HOW ANGRY YOU'VE BECOME OVER HOW THINGS ARE GOING. AL GORE SAW THE DANGER IN REFUSING A PEACEFUL TRANSFER OF POWER. 

NOW IT'S YOUR TURN.

Your kids are in DANGER

Mom and Dad:

WE NEED YOU TO BE THE GROWN UPs ONE LAST TIME

FIGHT THIS DANGER WE CAN'T

SIGNED, 

GENERATION X

THE ONES YOU FORGOT.

The Bibliography

Okay folks here is the start of the bibliography. I don't remember how to write a bib anymore.

"The Bell Curve." By Charles Murray and Richard Herrnstein 1994

"Torn Apart" By Charles Murray 

"Bowling Alone." Robert D Putman

"The Bell Curve Wars." Steven 

"Mismeasure of Men." Steven J Gould.

"A Troublesome Inheritance." Nicholas Wade.

"The Undeserving Poor." Michael B. Katz.

"Five Families." Oscar Lewis

Articles/PDF's

Torn Apart? The Impact of Manufacturing Employment Decline on Black and White Americans Eric D. Gould Link 

The World Famous Vox Article on the Bell Curve  author Charles Murray and Sam Harris. Link HERE.

PODCASTS

Sam Harris interview with Charles Murray. HERE.

Sam Harris interview with Robert Plomin. HERE.

Sam Harris interview with Kathryn Paige Harden (Co-author of the Vox Article.)

Videos:

Robert Plomin A blueprint: How DNA makes us who we are. Google Talk

The growing correlation between RACE and SAT 

Charles Murray The Bell Curve: Revisited. 

Bill Kristoll Interview With Charles Murray