Showing posts sorted by relevance for query electoral. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query electoral. Sort by date Show all posts

Monday, March 13, 2006

A proposal to get "rid" of the Electoral College


Electoral College Drop-Out -

It goes without saying as a true "democrat" I support any attempt at ending this archaic nonsense.

"Intriguingly, another solution is now in the offing, one that ingeniously circumvents the Electoral College without actually getting rid of it. It's the brainchild of John Koza, a computer scientist and Stanford professor who has been fascinated with the Electoral College ever since he invented a computer game based on it in the mid-1960s.

It has been embraced by electoral reform groups including Common Cause and the Center for Voting and Democracy, and championed by a handful of prominent elder statesmen including Birch Bayh, the Indiana Democrat; John Anderson, the Illinois Republican turned independent presidential candidate; and our very own Tom Campbell, the former Republican congressman and economic adviser to Governor Schwarzenegger.

Here's how it works: The Constitution says that states have to appoint a slate of electors to the Electoral College, but it does not specify how they appoint them.

As Antonin Scalia pointed out somewhat sinisterly in the Supreme Court's Bush v. Gore ruling, voting for the president on a state-by-state basis has come about by tradition, not by constitutional fiat. The Constitution in fact makes no provision for a right to vote at all. "

Play around with an electoral map here.

The Future Of Presidential Politics, more on the movement to end the Electoral College system!


The Future Of Presidential Politics:

"The latest effort to do away with the Electoral College is one that could have legs. Detractors have been around since the dawn of the Republic. The split decision between the national popular vote and the Electoral College in the 2000 election gave these folks fuel. And 2004 was only half of a football stadium away from a similar circumstance, flipping Republicans to the short end of the electoral vote stick. "

Thursday, April 21, 2005

Why won't we change the Electoral College?

While I await a call back from Risk Management I have been reading a a good book. "Why the Electoral College is Bad for America" by George C Edwards III.

Mr Edwards is left aghast at the lack of protest over the 2000 "selection" of the presidency. He points out that the electoral system is profoundly undemocratic, complicated,and ripe with fraud.

In the preface to the book Mr. Edwards finds it "disconcerting that the supporters of the electoral college are extraordinarly insouciant about their claims on its behalf and virtually never marshall data rigorously to evaluate their assertions."

How for instance can both big states and small states benefit from the college as has been asserted. And for those republicans who think this is democratic sour grapes, Kerry would have won with no regrets had he taken Ohio.

Tuesday, November 04, 2008

Don't use the keyword "election" in a blog post today you wont get any hits

3:26 a.m. in the morning before the election.

I found my polling place on the internet. I confirmed I am registered to vote.

I am thinking I should live blog the election. The only problem is that I have to work until 8 pm Arizona time which means the election is going to be over before I get around to figuring out how to "blog mobiley."

I am pretty sure I can mobile blog, but I haven't really tried yet.

If I can. I will.

  • I wonder if there will be riots in the streets
  • I wonder if the Republicans will steal another election
  • I wonder if the Electoral College will produce another presidential winner who did not win the popular vote and if it does will that finally be the last straw for the electoral college?
  • I hope Keith Olberman gets to Anchor the coverage for MSNBC.

Need to get in the mood for the election? Go visit my incomparable archives:

Go read my take on Keith here!

Go read my thoughts on the Electoral College System.

Just some thoughts on the election before it happens.

Keep checking back. And pray for Obama.

12:13 pm

I get out of bed. I am off to shower and dash to the polling booth. Then I will head to work for the next 6 hours. I will attempt some live blogging.

Saturday, March 15, 2008

I have no faith in our election process, as I write this, I spoon down pounds of cheerios, because it lowers my 300 count cholesterol

"You'd be surprised what the human mind and body can adjust to."

Those words were spoken by a homeless man who lives under the subway in New York City. He's been living underground there for over 4 years. He used to have running water, but the authorities cut that off. He tells the documentarian how the running water spoiled him "because of course you could get used to that kind of thing."



I guess you can get used to all kids of things like: the messed up way we elect our leaders in such a non-democratic format... like winner take all primaries, our screwy electoral college system is way funkier that it seems, election fraud, wire tapping of the the citizenry, 1 million people on the terrorist watch list, or a real bad economy...... if you want to.

Me? I am have trouble focusing, and that's keeping me from writing on this and some other subjects (that link is sorta random -it's a link to a rant on keith olbermann) like "reification and my goofy friend who thinks there can't possible be an argument for the non-existence of god, when he looks over with surprised eyes at me "do you know any?" and this is a guy i'd like to think was pretty smart, but oh, well."

Instead I have switched fonts on you to tell you something is up...I am going to be free associating more than normal, like your were the murderess of an ostensibly cool college rock band and I am typing away trying to impress* you with what one of my girl friend's called my "rich inner life" which was just her way of saying "you have too much of a poor outer life and I am moving upstate to get away from you, and to fuck lumberjacks, because it is every girls wish to fuck a lumberjack at some time, and I can finally do it once I dump your loser ass."

* I am pretty sure this is what they call an inside joke. One person will get it though. Can you believe that I wrote this after I wrote that e-mail to you? Ya...me either....though what I was saying in the e-mail and what appears here as hackery of that idea is two other things, but I ran out of "steam" as I really got into the idea of writing this, so I have to apologize to those who are reading this even though I am talking to you right now and not to them and I think it's kind of rude for them to read this part when it is so obvious I am not talking to them but I am talking to you...

i don't really see her point as she could have fucked lumberjacks right here, but this chick was all about authenticity and I mean that. I am not just saying that to get some cheapo shot off against a girl who treated me "ok" except when she was dumping me to fuck lumberjacks.

I know I am breaking the cardinal rule of Strunk and White by going on like this, by "carrying a breezy affect (or is it effect I read the book I should know) but fuck Strunk and fuck White or whoever wrote that part. I am going to write like this tonight because I'm frustrated by my inability to sit down and really write something meaningful. I can only write stupid jokes about 'fucking' lumberjacks and now a host of idiots typing Google into their browsers are going to find me when they are doing searches for funny jokes about lumberjacks, but I think that's kind of funny as the joke is on them.

As difficult as it is to type with a handful of cheerios it is slightly more difficult to get through the workday if you are most people. Fuck I am out of cheerios and I was on my third bowl of cheerios. I should tell you though mini sized bowls that are "child sized" and not meant for an adult.

I know you are probably thinking that I don't really write anything substantial anyway, so why am I so worried that I can't seem to focus and write on topics that are of interest to me now. You've got a point of course unless of course unlike me you don't think that spirit wives, underaged girls, and celebrity gossip is somehow substantial. You are wrong, but that's a disagreement that we can agree to disagree about later unless you really want to disagree with that, but I really wish you wouldn't be so disagreeable.

I have no faith in our election process, and you knew at some point I was going to have to get into the topic sentence of this rant, but like always I have waited for as long as I could possibly get away with it because I like pissing people off who don't like me.

I was eating at one of my favorite restaurants the other night (I eat out a lot and when I eat out I like to make fun of servers who have english accents and I don't care if they end up in my line at work and tell me how they are planning on franchising the restaurant because I like english accents and I like that restaurant) and I brought up the point that I feel like I have lost faith in our election process, and I feel like most other people have too, but I have yet to see a general consensus like that reported in the news. And (while left unsaid) perhaps that's why there is no general consensus as to what we should really do something about it.

Of course one of my obnoxiously agnostic friends suggested that perhaps there is no general consensus to ameliorate the fictional problem I am pointing out, because most people have not lost faith with our system.

His point was something like "in politics there is now, always has been, always will be shenanigans, so what's the point in getting upset about it now? It's not all that different really." (I'll call this Thesis 1--in addition let's add an explainer to thesis 1-- we don't really notice things because we are too tired from working shitty jobs and watching commercials.)

Maybe he's right. If you read the constitution to the United States it reads like "we really like this democracy idea ...let's get around to it sometime." And I know that republicans have been getting away with suppressing the vote for years and democrats in chicago can vote after they die (and boy you gotta admire the city folk of chicago and their sense of civic duty going about voting way after you would think they care) so is it really different?

well. I don't care if it is different. How about that? It's a crying shame what we got going on right now. I mean a lot of folks think that Bush stole the election. You might think that would get some people mad. We've got computer vote counters that don't add up. And that stuff gets reported. It gets reported that the guy who own Diebold (don't let'em change their name) is a fucking republican hack job guy. I mean if I was a republican even I'd be a little upset.

Bill Clinton's wife is looking each and every way she can (to super delegates and other such non-sense) to get herself elected like the popular vote doesn't even matter anymore. Which I guess if you leaned anything from 2000 it's that it doesn't matter.

This is the 21st Century, I think we can figure out a way to count votes. This is not a hard problem, but we all accept it like it is, just the way we let the so called "commission of getting people we like elected" to tell us who gets to debate and we let them change the rules right in front of, as they go along, anytime they get spooked. I guess there is nothing we can do about it. We couldn't come up with public financing or anything else. We can just bemoan the complicated nature and the intricacies of how money gets turned into speech for corporations and corporations aren't even people. (yes solyent green still is)

It just seems to me that, that this is one hell of a laundry list, and that makes me long for the sweet natured naivety of Watergate. But back then we had some faith in out government, and got pissed if it didn't work right. We didn't just say "government as usual" and "is there someway we can privatize this mess so that the people who brought you new and improved Lay's potato chips now with laxatives can get a shot at things?"

I lay this at the foot of Jimmy Carter for being such a pussy* and not fighting like a Democrat, but like a democrat (see Bill Clinton and his wife whenever they contemplates failure.)* i'm not saying vote for nader.

I guess what I am saying here is that there might be some actual problems here. (and some of them of them are systemic...the electoral college is not democratic and if you don't know why I wish you'd go find out why, but I won't bother with links if you can't come up with a reason why it might not be democratic and-- I don't give a fuck about Rhode Island--is it even an island after all? Bunch of fucking liars they have over there.)

So if there are problems why don't we see problems and if we see problems why don't we have answers and if we have answers why don't we see the answers? I wish I had an answer to that.

WE ARE TOO RICH TO CARE.

(I'll call this thesis number 2)

What I failed to include (until I added the explainer) in my rambling discussion of thesis One is that it goes hand in hand with how Americans are too tired to vote anyway that we all have jobs that keep us down and the media "manufactures consent*."

*(damn media always making me want stuff--like I never wanted chicken for breakfast, but after watching all those McDonald's commercials about the chicken biscuit I gotta admit I'd like one, but I a'int getting up that early just to try a biscuit and some chicken, though if you know anybody who's tried one tell me what they thought about it!)
Thesis one and Thesis two seem to logically contradict each other, but in a nuanced debate I will accept that it can be shown they don't strictly contradict each and certainly are not mutually incompatible. (that's not how I wanted to say it, but you get the point)

I know I forgot how to show you how my earlier discussion ties in with thesis 1 but this is already a long post and I don't think i want to waste your time there so lets just agree that it does, ok? See? It's better when we don't fight.

Thesis 2 is a subdivision of why didn't the middle class ever fight the rich and bring the communist revolution to fruition? It's the pay raises stupid the pay raises!! well...that and color tv. Though I fail to understand why the cubans have put up with the revolution for so long in that case...

The simply fact remains that there are winners and losers in every economy and this culture has failed to produce a consistent resistance.

But you will object to this picture of American Exeptionalism and offer Noam Chomsky as proof. He will tell anyone who will listen that we are living in best world possible,* a time period of mass resistance, which is just Chomsky's way of being gay for Seattle, like my ex-girlfriend is gay for coffee and lumberjacks.

*(if by best world possible we live a a shitty world where there were some people who didn't just sit around and say we live in a shitty world, but they would go out and have meeting on occasion and in those meetings occasionally a resolution would pass where some of them would say that things are shitty and the majority would vote saying that was indeed so.)

And I will tell you that if you want to bring up every random fact you learned from your 8th grade history book in the name of layering additional complexities at me, I am going to have to kick your ass.

Wednesday, November 05, 2008

Congrats President Hussein. Life just got a lot more like an episode of 24

Today's Poop Watch is green with nuts.*

*I'm going to start including pictures with my descriptions.

My shit has been green for a few day, and if I was one of you crazy Republicans I would probably blame it all on Barack Hussein Obama. But since I am not a crazy Republican, I have to look to science for an explanation.

According to science green shit can be caused by not digesting my food. My working hypothesis is that all the antacids I am eating to control my acid reflux has reduced the acid level of my stomach to the point that I no longer digest my food properly.

The other probability is cancer.

My acid reflux is not as bad as it was while I was drinking soda all day, but I have to tell you that it has not all together disappeared. I may have to seek medical advice, and even though I now have medical insurance I still don't have a doctor. I am not sure if I will.

Even if I get a doctor there is the little matter of the 250 dollar deductible will have to come up to pay for any of the medical services I may receive.

All I know about deductibles is I assume they are all a thing of the past since we elected a Obama to the highest office in the land. Barack got my vote (even if it was cast on a provisional ballot in Arizona, a state that gave him exactly zero electoral votes) so like a lot of people I figure he owes me.

Caution. Don't get your hopes up.

President Hussein may not be the Anti-Christ, but he is also not our savior. He is just another politician. Obviously one of the great Orators of the 21st century or any other, but he is just a man and just a typical politician.

Politicians rule from the center. If you don't believe me just check out any of the comments from Speaker Pelosi about her new huge advantage in Congress.

Pelosi has no intention of using any of the political capital that this historic election has given her. She has already stated that this election did not give the Democrats a mandate. She added that this election was not about ideology.

That is precisely why we won't get investigations into the Bush administration. It is exactly why we won't get energy independence.

I think what we can look forward to is the re-emergence of America's standing in the world. We will work with our allies. We will stop torturing citizens of the world. We may add some piecemeal stop gags to the health care system.

What I am trying to tell my progressive friends is that after you read this post tomorrow morning you will wake to find the same America that you had last night. Even if Obama wanted he could not turn America into Sweden overnight. And unless I misread him 100%, Obama has no plan whatsoever to turn the U.S. into the socialist utopia you want.

I am not talking to the sophisticated progressives who have experience in organizing and protesting. I am talking to the people who consciousness Obama awakened through his inspirational talks. He has a lot of poor people believing that when he assumes office we won't have to worry about gas prices or the mortgage.

Of course nothing could be further from the case.

Barack Obama is the shiny face of Industrial Capitalism in its death throws. It appears that the current fiscal crisis has finally taught American Capitalism the same lessons that Europeans learned so many years ago. That the naked unbridled quest for greed is bad. That community is necessary.

Capital is resilient. It has sent one more volley back that we must return. Down to sets to love and facing elimination, Capital is taking a swing for the fences. It wants to get back in the game, so it has conceded what it must. It will offer some kind of health care. It will work to resolve what it can of the growing nightmare that is global warming.

I could list ad infinitum the possible forces that will mitigate the destructive impulses of our Capitalist economy.

But there are certain things that Capital will not concede. It will never concede the private appropriation of the surplus of the means and goods we produce socially.

To grasp this idea all you need to know is the consequence of my point. We will never have a rationale society as long as there is Capitalism.

I wish President Hussein all the luck in the world taming the beast he rides. But we all know how this ride ends. Either in oblivion, or the socially organized production of means of production.

Thursday, June 03, 2021

Tomorrow is a New Day and Tomorrow Never Comes

THE DISJUNCTION OF MODERNITY 

I have no ambition to better myself. 

I know how much that bothers many of you to hear. Very few things could be more anti- American than refusing to improve your station in life. I know for some of you this idea might be hard to picture. But it reminds me of a scene from my favorite movie Clerks. The two main characters are talking near the end of the film. Dante is trying to convince Randall how difficult change is for him:

   DANTE
   (sadly)
  My mother told me once that when I
  as three, my potty lid was closed,
  and instead of lifting it, I chose
  to shit my pants.

    RANDAL
  Lovely story.

    DANTE
  Point is-I'm not the kind of person
  that disrupts things in order to
  shit comfortablly. 

I can't say that I've ever heard anything that more succinctly describes my modus operandi. 

My lack of ambition used to bother me, and I know it bothered anyone I told. Whenever I admitted my truth that I had no particular talents, that I was bored of life, that improvement meant nothing to me because life is meaningless. I was always met with a protest, "Oh, you don't really mean that." People would say. What they really meant of course was that they did not want to feel meaningless, that they thought their mad skillz were impressive, and surely life had some kind of meaning, even if I couldn't figure it out. 

But I doubt my ambitionlessness means anything to most of you now. Most of you are bored and useless non-thinkers. Unlike you, my typical day consists of eating Jack in the Box failure food and contemplating the Nothingness of the Universe. A hobby that  just a hundred years ago was the past time of the rich, the insane, or the genius. Frederick Nietzsche nazel gazing at the Eternal Recurrence as his syphilitic mind spat out dreams of the überman as modernity itself spat out Eugenics and Hitler. "Aren't three generations of imbeciles enough?" It would ask. 

Americans have become low wage workers living in the decadence & crumbled ruins of a what was once was the Ultimate First World Country. Rising levels of productivity in the economy for decades have mocked the workers who created it as median levels of income have remained stagnant since the 1970's. Meanwhile the share of income at the top exploded to such obscene levels that richest men in the world have contemplated colonizing outer space. 

The pandemic startled America out of it's newest Gilded Age. The inept orangutan voted into office by a hollow and decayed middle class buried his head in the sand as thousands of Americanz died and many more lost their livelihoods. 

Suddenly, it wasn't just Professors of Marxist theory that exposed the ruling class propaganda for what it was. It was the people themselves. Nurses, cab drivers, grocery workers, delivery drivers kept the economy afloat. They risked their lives so that millions in the middle class could stay at home and work on ways to automate away the jobs they had previously celebrated. 

The pandemic made it clear to the Reagan democrats that job creators could do little to help. Upper and middle class folk saw heroism in simple acts like riding a bus to work a thankless job bagging groceries or emptying bed pans. Too afraid to leave their homes suddenly the middle class gated communities were at the mercy of the proletariat. Would the minimum wage security guard protect their insulated McMansions if they were desperate? Probably not they reasoned. 

And so began the government bailout. Trillions spent. Some of it even going to the poor themselves. $1,400 doesn't seem like much to the rich. But to the poor? It's a lot when you realize most poor people couldn't cover a 500 dollar emergency if they had to. Suddenly the poor had that in the bank. They were gifted an extra $600 in unemployment benefits if they lost their jobs. Most low wage workers had never earned that much money working full-time their whole lives! Most didn't know it was possible. 

In some ways the pandemic has been the best thing to happen to poor people since the Clinton boom years, if you disregard a half million lives being lost. And that's easy to do since the Wúhan virus was just a made up super flu that only kills the old and sick at rates less than 1 percent of the population. There were other negatives of course. The illuminati taught us to wear masks and accept social control. Everytime I pass a Covid-19 sheeple in his electric vehicle sitting by himself, but still wearing his mask I knew January 6th was no aberration. Our days as a Republic were over. But I'll still take that extra 600 bucks any day of the week. 

With that extra 600 dollars in pocket many minimum wage earners are shrugging off returning to work that offers only unpredictable schedules, low pay, no benefits, rude customers, and overall crappy work conditions. But the poor should be careful, because they can only go so long without work. And while the populace is ready for change, the system isn't. 

A FAILURE OF IMAGINATION A BRIEF PRIMER ON AMERICAN EXEPTIONALISM

There is no need to speculate using pseudo arm chair sociology what Americans are going through. And what's to come. What's coming is not more investment in the working class. It's not the reinvention of work. It's exceptionalism. American style. Despite calls to provide continued pandemic relief during these troubled times what you should expect from the system is right wing reactionary propaganda campaign against workers and a ruthless capitalism that will cut benefits and toss people to the streets. 

Unlike Sarah Palin's usage, American exceptionalism's original meaning wasn't a bravado statement about how great America was, it's a question about why America never developed socialism or strong worker movement. One of the reasons socialism never developed was the brutal form of economic warfare from the ruling class. American bosses put down labor strikes using governmental help and hired thugs to rough workers up. Strikes were violent affairs in the early days and you better bet Americans learned their lessons. You fight capitalism? You can get a bullet to the head. Don't expect capitalism to evolve quietly. It never does. Dozens of red states have already begun to cut the generous benefits and are putting in place measures to deny the unemployed any benefits at all. 

ARE WE WITNESSING THE FIRST LUMPEN PROLETARIAT REVOLUTION? 

The poor in America are quite familiar with the cruelty of Capitalism. Here in the USA desperate poverty is visible in ways that shock visitors from other countries. A million homeless in the streets. The mentally ill left to roam bus stops and raid garbage bins for dinner. It's a stark reminder for those on the bottom rung in America that things could get worse. Go to your minimum wage jobs. Don't complain. The homeless could be you if you aren't lucky. In the U.S. if you hear a person complain about work you often hear the rebuttal, "hey, at least you have a job." 

But the Lumpen Proletariat Revolution will not be won at work. For those of you who don't own a closet full of Marxist secondary literature, the lumpen proletariat were the underprivileged folks that played no role in history for Karl Marx. Prisoners, the disabled, the feeble minded, criminals of various sorts, the drunken, drugged out, suicidal, and misfits that could not be trusted to keep a job, join a union, or form a family to fight the ruling class. But how have things changed? 

I WEAR MY HOBO ON THE INSIDE 

It seems that yesterday's lumpen misfit is today's hope for radical transformation. The founder of communism, Karl Marx, understood that the worker held just one advantage over the rich. It was her ability to withhold her labor. Marx also rightly understood that the worker creates much of the value for the capitalist. Most workers; however, are afraid to use that power to strike. Today, it appears that the only workers willing to withhold their labor turn out to be the desperate and most underprivileged in society. 

I don't think it would have been much of a advantage a few years ago to have the outcasts of society withhold their labor. But today with labor force penetration at its lowest point ever, with millions of workers retiring, fewer babies being born, harsher attitudes towards migrant workers, along with the recalcitrant attitudes of many who worry about their continued health risks from acquiring Covid-19, along with the generous welfare benefits that allow millions of people to exit the workforce temporarily, the baseline of laborers is just too low for replacement much less economic growth. 

In addition we see a striking and unheard of growth in the disabled. Millions of workers are now excused from work because of poor health. On top of that we are living through the greatest and most destructive drug addiction epedemic the United States has ever known. 50,000 or more deaths a year from heroin. Suicides and death by alcohol are growing so quickly that the average life expectancy in the United States has dropped for the first time outside of war. The United States is fast approaching third world status for most of it's poor. The Lumpen revolution will not be a matter of strikes by ordinary workers. It won't be a top down unionization effort (though the brave McDonald's workers who strike for a 15 dollar wage have played an important role in economists looking at the minimum wage.) The revolution will be bottom up. 

Instead it will the disabled, the ex-cons denied employment, the morbidly obese, the drug addicts, the massive new homeless population from the financial cliff, the angry mothers without child care, the mentally ill, the fed up unskilled, the Gen Z kids who can't afford to leave home, and a smorgasbord of others who are either denied employment, or rationally choosing to forego working, along with the increasingly  alienated and angry unskilled workers who will sit at home that will frighten the small businesses and corporate leaders into raising incomes for all. 


Though most likely we will see the American dream die. The Republicans will use asymmetrical and non-conventional warfare to wrestle control of the White House. Egregious electoral reform will doom efforts to reorganize the economy, and the divide between the haves and the have nots will continue to widen. 

THE FINICIAL CLIFF COULD END AMERICA AS WE KNOW IT 

The financial cliff that awaits many on the other side of these pandemic benefits could force hundreds of thousands, maybe even millions of people into the streets. Homeless tent cities will become permanent fixtures. The busses and public transit will be filled with drug addicts nodding off. Public restrooms will be plastered with needles from the bloated corpses of heroin overdoses. 

It doesn't really matter if orthodox Marxists are correct and that changes from the base of the economy alter the superstructure of culture. Fewer jobs and forced automation make a skillless workforce redundant. There is a reason that the market did not increase low end worker's pay. The market knows these workers are replaceable. The market knows it has created a lazy and entitled underclass it can exploit. 

Continued improvement in productivity will allow capital to remove most of these unwanted workers from civil society. They will simply shuffle about with suitcases full of clothes from fast food restaurants to grocery stores stealing just enough food to survive. They will drink to forget. They will overdose on walkways. And the middle class will drive around them and mutter under their breath. The few workers who manage to survive on the miserly wages that unskilled labor pays will lament the freeloading welfare state for paying as much to freeloaders as they make with their pathetic paychecks. The poor will shame the underclass and do the work of ideology for the ruling classes. 

Daniel Bell believed that economy, politics, and culture were independent of one another. That modernism had a logic of despair and depravity that as Thomas Mann wrote that modernity, "cultivated a sympathy for the Abyss."

Bell didn't have much of a response to modern times. He hoped that old fashioned religion could provide meaning and solace to an overworked and overlooked populace. Today, Jordan Peterson gives many of the same insights to young men who've seen jobs dry up, their prospects for marriage disappear, who respond with despair and violence. Despite Bell's worry you don't need to cultivate a "sympathy for the abyss" when you live it. Maybe religion could offer respite in the future of tomorrow, but tomorrow never comes. 

Tuesday, May 28, 2024

Woke in Time! What's wrong with the extreme left & right? Absurdity in Modern Morality aka is it even possible to be moral anymore?

Why Hello, internet people! 

REJOICE! 

TODAY IS THE BEST DAY OF THE REST OF YOUR LIFE!!! 

Intro:

It's long been the purview of this blog/podcast to bring light into the darkness and to educate the masses. But I know the quest for TRUTH always brings enemies. 

But in these turbulent times, the search for truth is more critical than ever.  

THE TRUTH IS OUT THERE 

America is in crisis. 

If you ask Americans who their philosophical heroes are they are more likely to report Jordan Peterson, Oprah or Joe Rogan as an answer than Socrates or Ben Franklin. That's because Americans have no idea how philosophical theory effects their lives. Americans would rather take advice from a former game show host than explore the works of a brilliant thinkers. 

But philosophy is important. It affects your life more than you think. For instance what does a bunch of German philosophers from the 1840's have to do with problems in American today? 

Well for about 2 centuries those philosophers has been warning us that the West is over. The empire is done. Frederick Nietzsche (your morose teenager's favorite philosopher aka the guy who said "God is dead!") predicted exactly what would happen to society when the American style of living predominates {the End of History.} 

Unhinged:

You might ask where can we find political answers to our problems when the ideas within the extreme left and right seem unhinged: either crazy or broken? The extremes within the Intelligentsia have put forth ideas that are beyond problematic, they are out-right dangerous; meanwhile, those extreme ideas are beginning to gain widespread acceptance outside of their communities. It's why I've been talking about the most bizarre ideas in our culture so much. Those ideas are taking  root and I believe you must be warned about this danger, so we can take action! 

THE END OF HISTORY 

After the fall of Communism a number of elites were lulled into to accepting  Fukayama's proclamation that we were living at the End of History. However; most of them interpreted his ideas incorrectly. They forgot his emphasis on the Last Man. We are the last Men at the end of history.

But first. LIKE most interpretation of Fukayama we thought the riddle of history had been solved for us. Liberal democracy and some kind of market capitalism was the solution to the riddle of societal organization.

According to Fukayahma we no longer need to worry about building institutions. Democratic Institutions maintain themselves. We don't need to enact laws to protect democracy. Democracy is self-renewing. In the modern capitalist society we don't need to think of our neighbors as fellow patriotic coutrymen. Libs worry that Patriotism is colonizing, tyrannical, and ethnocentric. All we NEED to do is isolate ourselves at home and buy whatever makes us happy on Amazon. The engine of economic cooperation will be the ties that bind us together.

FAILURES FROM THE LEFT & RIGHT

Critics & pseudo-intellectuals like myself have failed to understand the most important function of culture, which is to to build a workable society. Instead we focused on  reforming our shortcomings so much so that our cultural foundations themselves became the subject of great debate.*

In that debate the right's claim to moral superiority was destroyed by (objective) progressive moral reforms; while the right's ability to rule democratically was undone by massive demographic shifts in the country. Demographic shifts that resulted in a reactionary turn to populism within the right.

The debate for ethics on the left was won by those who use post-modernism & critical theory in order to deconstruct the patriarchial & white supremacist power structures of the status quo. But instead of building a new society from the ashes of deconstruction all the left did was replace 'the white male patriarchy' with anti-racist and anti-male slogans. The new slogan of the democratic party should be, "don't worry about addressing wealth inequality" or racism when Amazon has a 'lift all black voices button!' 

So what kind of new society do we want to build? I don't know yet, but if you ask my leftist friends they'll probably mumble something to you about inclusiveness. Nice slogan. But what does inclusiveness mean when in practice our society is self-segregating more and more?  

On one hand the left offers the destruction of traditional society and the deconstruction of our ideals, but with the colapse of Marxism it no longer offers real solutions; meanwhile, the right's only response to emerging crisis is to show its new ideas are nothing other than it's old ideas, a return to Authoritarianism

System Failure: it's the end of the world world as we know it! 

The collapse of industrial society was predicted in the 1970's by MIT super computers. The only thing the computers got wrong was the time line. MIT predicted 2040. Unfortunately, the collapse time-line is accelerating. With global warming, destruction of the middle class, pandemics, war in Europe, and supply lines shattered.You don't need to read about a woman could make a million dollars in a year selling her farts in a jar to know we are years ahead of the 2040 supercomputer schedule. 

How'd we get here? The West is the middle of an economic collapse the likes of which it has never known. It is fully unprepared for the ramifications. 

 Repressive Power vs normalized Power 
While undergoing a legitimation crisis. 

Morality falters during the colapse of society. 

It is a crisis of knowledge. [epistemology]  

Right uses post modern epistemology without knowing it. 

The last man


Expect to see the poor and even your middle class lifestyle decline. I'm not just talking about your income or wealth. Though that will happen {especially} for single men and women. America ran on low wage jobs and human exploitation. But the great resignation is taking care of that. Don't expect staffing levels to return quickly. Do not expect the supply issues  to correct themselves. And expect business to take advantage of inflation for profit growth. 

A crisis of being. 

But I'm also talking about the things that make life worth living. Like your ability to make connections to family and friends.

The ties that bind us together are being broken. I lived through the stagflation and malaise of the 1970's, but something feels different from even that period. In the last year alone in the USA we've had 100,000 drug overdose deaths. We've had 20,000 murders. And that rate increased by 30 percent! Along with 45,000 suicides (and the numbers are just climbing for people of color.) The unemployed and homeless population have exploded. In my city alone rent for 1bedrioms average more than $1600.00 and the number of homeless increased by 400% in a year. 

Part of the reason for these numbers is that economy is collapsing for working people and the middle class. Rent is too high. All the good blue collar jobs have been shifted overseas. The disparity between the rich and the poor is now higher than ever. There is a growing gap in who trusts their neighbors. We don' trust or like our neighbors anymore.  

Our culture has grown increasingly coarse and individualistic. We have been slowly tugging at the threads of society and it's unraveling. 

The left's answers to our problems feel like nothing more than shallow sloganeering, rather than system building. While the answers on the right verge on facsism and a cult like admiration of authoritarianism.  When  combined with a heavy mixture of libertarian/surveillance capitalism that has run amok, well friends, you can forsee the danger that portends for yourselves. 

CHALLENGE FROM THE RIGHT: FACSISM WILL COME DRAPED IN THE FLAG. 

Unlike many of my fellow critics who now attack the left, but only give lip service to correcting the problems on the right, I will tackle the problems I see on the right before dealing with my concerns with the so called 'woke' left. 

THE WHITE POWER STRUCTURE IS ATTEMPTING TO HOLD ON TO POWER AT ANY COST, IT WILL COST US DEMOCRACY 

You don't have to be following all the shenanigans the current Republicans are doing to know that they are on pace to destroy democracy. And you don't have to be versed in the awful history of our country to recognize that democracy in the USA never really meant democracy for all.

We ought to be familiar with those fights by now. Women and minorities have been agitating for full citizenship since the republic's founding. They have made great progress, but there are always counter revolutions and reactions with any victories. 

WHAT'S WRONG WITH THE RIGHT? 

When we look into the problems on the right they are obvious, easy to enumerate, and straight forward to diagnose. Though the obstacles they present to us may be insurmountable. 

These people have no shame...

Turns out we can no longer hold conservative Americans accountable for what they believe. Because instead of standing for something all they've become is the anti- Democratic party. So we can't engage in debate with the right to complain that they have abandoned the so called American way of life.™ Folks on the right no longer believe in democracy. They BELIEVE that democracy has failed THEM. And they believe that authoritarianism is the only way to save "America" from itself. 

The right's resurgence in authoritarian and fascist beliefs along with the development of a troubling new religion in Trumpism led to an attack on the basic institutions of our democracy. An attack that... (when)... it prevails will be an existential threat to our way of life. (In a future post I will go into greater detail about how serious the Republican attack on democracy really is.)

The cliff that the right's contempt for democracy is pushing us towards is a Silent Totalitarianism© advanced by the purveyors of surveillance capitalism & anti-democratic forces within the Republican Party. 

In addition to trying to destroy democracy there's another problem with the right. The cult of Trumpism. A new RELIGION that isn't so much based on Trump the actual existing man, but based on the conspiratorial thinking that he inspired. Why not the man? First, Trump is an obvious conman. As Sam Harris once said, "Donald Trump is a stupid person's idea of a smart person and a poor person's idea of a rich man." How the right has allowed itself to become infatuated with such an obvious self-angrandizing narcissist is beyond me. Inexplicably the apotheosis of Trump doesn't just come from his supporters. 

In some cases religious leaders with real followings have proposed that Trump is the second coming. Some people are convinced that the creator of the universe is either using Trump to jump start the end times or suggesting that Trump might himself be God. That idea is bereft of any common sense. But the intelgensia on the right have pushed that idea and now metaphorically believe the Earth is flat and feel compelled to steer us over the edge. 

How to defend democracy

Much of the new Trumpism sounds insane. I can't imagine Bob Dole being a Q-anon follower or regarding Donald Trump as the literal second coming of Jesus Christ. But the Republican tent no longer houses men of stature like Bob Dole. Instead we have men like Trump & his sycophants. 

Despite the clownish behavior the right presents an absolute danger of destroying our democracy. In oder to defend democracy against the asymmetrical warfare that the right engages upon we need to do the following:
  1. Abolish the Electoral College 
  2. Pack the Courts 
  3. Pass Voting Rights Bill 
  4. Charge violent demonstrators from Jan 6th and imprison them. 
  5.  Charge Trump with incitement 
  6. Remove congressmen that aided or supported inserection 
  7. End the Fillabuster 
  8. Add District of Columbia and Puerto Rico as states 
  9. Felons automatically reinstate their right to vote after prison 

WOKE JUST IN TIME. What's wrong with the Left? 

Those of us on the left got our wish. For decades the left has pushed for the destruction/deconstruction of power centers. Now we've got front row tickets to the decline of America. 

Why is leftist culture involved in the rot of the core of our country? Was it the ideology, stupid? The left has been accused by the right of being overly sensitive. In response to their new found sensibilities the left has erected safe spaces while political correctness has increased so much that the right wing suggests that college is nothing more than indoctrination for students from conservative homes. 

Though I think the indoctrination criticism goes too far, the safe spaces and trigger alerts are stifling debate on college campuses. We are raising snowflakes that have abandoned the left's commitment to defending free speech. The left no longer tolerates any speech it disagrees with, and it wants to silence and punish speech that questions it's post-modern foundations.
  
Many critics of the left contend the left has it's own new religion- one of identity politics or "wokeness." It's cancel culture is the blasphemy of the middle ages and public humiliation & scorn are its new weapons. 

In one case that seems quite egregious to me a professor at Portland State, Peter Boghossian, resigned over what he termed was retaliation for his efforts to bring controversial speakers to his campus & his punishment for submitting a number of hoax papers reminiscent of the Sokal Affair. 

THE DISINGENUOUS LEFT 

The left wants radical and fundamental change to society and since the fall of Marxism has been unable or unwilling to have an honest conversation with the country about what it really wants. 

For instance when feminists talk about the wage gap they tend to use the tactic of blame don't explain. The standard talking points about the wage gap between men and women gives the impression that women are underpaid for the same job. Feminism insists on making the wage gap appear to be the 'purposeful' discrimination of men being paid higher wages for similar job duties with similar experience when in fact most feminists know this isn't true and they know exactly why the wage gap exists. 

The wage gap exists because women work fewer hours than men. They choose (or are forced to choose if patriarchy still exerts that kind of power) jobs that pay less on the wage market. Women decide to have babies and when they do they often quit their jobs to perform the unpaid labor of childcare. I'm not suggesting that taking time off after birthing is not a bad thing. Indeed families should be able to do this. But this requires an extirely different approach than the USA capitalist economy is built on. As a society we should ask the hard questions about the costs associated with raising families and how it should do it. 

But just asking those kind of questions to leftists rather than agreeing with them about patriarchy gets interpreted like literal violence engaged in the culture wars to leftists. Further, they think we can't win those arguments over the right. But I think the left is wrong. We can win those arguments and we can do so without demonizing the other side. 

So what's the problem with a little fib like "the wage gap is caused by outright discrimination?" For one, if the 78 percent wage gap isn't actually caused by outright discrimination then the proposed solutions to the problem won't be effective. The paycheck protection act won't fix enough of the wage gap (which is estimated to be caused only around 5 percent.) We also don't get to be heroic fighters against oppression, nor do we need to accept or be accountable for our own collaboration with the status quo. Just being female makes us victims and heroes all at once. 

Violence and CAUSATION? 

Whats the cause of patriarchy? 



THE POST MODERN CHALLENGE FROM THE LEFT 


THE PROBLEMS WITH POST MODERN THEORY 

One dimensional 
Socrates vs sophists 
Anti science 
Anti free speech 
Anti reason 
Anti-men 

THE 'PROBLEMATICS' OF THE LIFEWORLD: Why your life doesn't make sense anymore. 

I've always been fascinated by human behavior. When I was a child I wanted to be a neuro-psychologist, but then I learned that one needed to understand math at a very high level. So I gave up on that dream, just like Freud did, and I turned to reading countless books on psychology and sociology by people who can do math to satisfy my curiosity. 

Should we be using theory to interpret our ordinary interactions with society? Instead of saying my mother loves me should I bring up attachment theory? Should I discuss Freud's psychosexual theories or explain my mother's connection to me as a result of evolution convincing my parents to spread her genetic heritage?

I imagine that most ordinary folk hearing these questions probably think that idea absurd if not a little silly. But if we were to take that set of ideas and apply it to power structures like say the Patriarchy or White Supremacy you would get an extremely different reaction from the radical left. 

For the left it's impossible to have interactions that aren't viewed through the lens of some power dynamic. 

Fart girl 

Plato vs the sophists on justice

* Functionalism as a theoretical perspective can not be ignored. 

Break the glass. It's time to squash the system. 

No religion. Kill the humans 

What's Left? The Last Man.



Selected bibliography: